Abdullah represents what the government insists it is fighting. He is a Salafist, an adherent to a puritanical Islam, though he disavows the term. To him, Salafists bear arms, and he understands that the moment he and others fire a bullet in Homs or anywhere else, the regime will have the justification it covets to crush them with even more force. But there was no question of his devotion to a state that adheres to Islam as its foundation, and he dismissed the comparatively liberal rhetoric of some Islamic activists, like the Muslim Brotherhood. “They want to satisfy the West, and they don’t want to satisfy Muslims,” he told me the next morning. “They say, ‘We’re a modern Islam.’ But there’s no such thing as modern Islam. There’s Islam, and there’s secularism.” We debated the imposition of religious law and whether Christians and Muslims could intermarry. For the first time since I met him, Abdullah grew angry at me, when I suggested that no Christian or Alawite would subscribe to his vision of the state he would build in the wake of the revolution. He quickly cooled, aware that he shouldn’t show his emotions. At one point, he even suggested that however he might feel, however draconian he believed religious law should be, he was still a minority in the opposition. As much as the activists here talk of unity in the face of government oppression, I often felt as I did in Iraq in those early months after the American invasion in 2003. The more people denied their differences, the more apparent they became. For Iyad, Abdullah and others, there was deep anger at Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite movement that has baldly supported the Syrian regime. That anger had spilled into chauvinism against Shiite Muslims, intensifying the hostility they already felt for Alawites. They understood the importance of nonviolence, but even Abdullah admitted that if Assad fell, sectarian vendettas would erupt in the countryside. One of the young men warned darkly that events “were headed toward violence.”
Ana
Total
Total :
Jumlah Artikel
Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
-
...if you are very, very rich. (Most mss. of this age and quality are in national or university libraries and are not for sale at any price...
-
Jeff contemplates Jefferson at Williamsburg: Poring over a 15th-century legal tract, Jefferson encountered a modern preface arguing that a ...
-
From the New York Times, news of an edition of the Bible annotated solely with C.S. Lewis quotations: The Lewis Bible, available in cloth (1...
Kamis, 01 September 2011
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Recent
Weekly
-
...if you are very, very rich. (Most mss. of this age and quality are in national or university libraries and are not for sale at any price...
-
Jeff contemplates Jefferson at Williamsburg: Poring over a 15th-century legal tract, Jefferson encountered a modern preface arguing that a ...
-
From the New York Times, news of an edition of the Bible annotated solely with C.S. Lewis quotations: The Lewis Bible, available in cloth (1...
-
Couple of weeks ago, to my great surprise, a writer named Ted Gioia wrote an article about science-fiction author Cordwainer Smith for the A...
-
The English lawsuit, Scrope v. Grosvenor has a prominent place in the history of heraldry, since a record of the case before the court of ch...
-
From The Medieval Review: Bell, Adrian R., Anne Curry, Adam Chapman, Andy King, and David Simpkin, ed. The Soldier Experience in the Fourtee...
-
I didn't know about this book until a few minutes ago, but I take a positive review by Jonathan Jarrett on such a subject pretty serio...
-
In Charny's Questions on Tournaments , there is a case proposed to Charny's audience about a knight who brings a beautiful destrier ...
-
I am indebted to the Iraqi journalists who report for McClatchy, an American news service, from Baghdad. In recent days they have been inter...
-
Carnivalesque is a monthly "carnival" which collects interesting links from blogs that discuss pre-modern history. Every other ...
0 Comment to "More ominously from Syria"
Posting Komentar