Twenty years ago--with the end of the Cold War--American policy got dammed up:
It was clear we needed to do something to balance the long-term social-insurance spending promises both parties were making with the long-term tax base, and we haven't.
It was clear--first for national-security and domestic-congestion reasons, and then for global-warming reasons as well--that we needed to start imposing Pigovian taxes on coal and oil-driven energy use, and we haven't.
It was clear that we needed to reform America's health care financing system, and we haven't.
It was clear that America, as the globe's sole hyperpower, had a unique opportunity to build a world in which we could live very comfortably and peacefully once we were no longer a hyperpower or even a superpower but instead only one (if we are lucky) of several great powers--and we haven't.
To this in the past three years we have added:
A recognition that the "Greenspanist" bet--deregulate finance, rely on financial company shareholders via corporate control to limit moral hazard, and bet that the Federal Reserve can lean up after any elephants that stampede through--was wrong. We need to restructure financial regulation--and we haven't.
A recognition that the "central problem of macroeconomics" has not in fact been solved. We need to solve it--both in the short run of recovery from this recession, and in the long run of creating a world that is net, whether through global imbalances or other factors, as vulnerable to episodes like this as our world turns out to be.
About these six issues, two questions:
Which of these six policy issues will--as many of them have been doing--continue to drift, and what damage will drifting do?
Which of these six policy issues will the Obama administration actually be able to address--and what will be the consequences for the world of how it addresses them?
Ana
Total
Total :
Jumlah Artikel
Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
-
...if you are very, very rich. (Most mss. of this age and quality are in national or university libraries and are not for sale at any price...
-
I haven't seen a lot of Fellini movies, and I certainly missed this one when it first came out. It may be just as well -- I don't kn...
History World
economic history
economics
USA
world history
Brad DeLong provides an approach to the last 20 years of world history
Rabu, 28 Oktober 2009
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Recent
Weekly
-
...if you are very, very rich. (Most mss. of this age and quality are in national or university libraries and are not for sale at any price...
-
A dissent from the Globe and Mail's endorsement: Anyone but Harper.
-
I haven't seen a lot of Fellini movies, and I certainly missed this one when it first came out. It may be just as well -- I don't kn...
-
An excerpt of the review on the e-mail list, TMR-L (The Medieval Review) , a useful and timely resource you can subscribe to free. Greco, Gi...
-
That's what one expert said about the biggest Anglo-Saxon treasure trove ever found -- a huge collection of items, many of them stripped...
-
Carnivalesque is a monthly "carnival" which collects interesting links from blogs that discuss pre-modern history. Every other ...
-
I am indebted to the Iraqi journalists who report for McClatchy, an American news service, from Baghdad. In recent days they have been inter...
-
Stephen Chrisomalis at Glossographia revisits an old debate. A couple of tasty passages: I do not believe there are any grounds at all to ...
-
Not exactly puritanical: From Arabist.net with this commentary: A wonderful video in the context of calls for strict censorship in state...
-
I am working away at a book about French military history in the 14th century, and I've just come to the realization that my planned tit...
0 Comment to "Brad DeLong provides an approach to the last 20 years of world history"
Posting Komentar